Setup and Config
Getting and Creating Projects
Branching and Merging
Sharing and Updating Projects
Inspection and Comparison
- 2.4.1 → 2.13.1 no changes
- 2.4.0 04/30/15
In a workflow employing relatively long lived topic branches, the developer sometimes needs to resolve the same conflicts over and over again until the topic branches are done (either merged to the "release" branch, or sent out and accepted upstream).
This command assists the developer in this process by recording conflicted automerge results and corresponding hand resolve results on the initial manual merge, and applying previously recorded hand resolutions to their corresponding automerge results.
|You need to set the configuration variable rerere.enabled in order to enable this command.|
Normally, git rerere is run without arguments or user-intervention. However, it has several commands that allow it to interact with its working state.
Reset the metadata used by rerere if a merge resolution is to be aborted. Calling git am [--skip|--abort] or git rebase [--skip|--abort] will automatically invoke this command.
- forget <pathspec>
Reset the conflict resolutions which rerere has recorded for the current conflict in <pathspec>.
Display diffs for the current state of the resolution. It is useful for tracking what has changed while the user is resolving conflicts. Additional arguments are passed directly to the system diff command installed in PATH.
Print paths with conflicts whose merge resolution rerere will record.
Print paths with conflicts that have not been autoresolved by rerere. This includes paths whose resolutions cannot be tracked by rerere, such as conflicting submodules.
Prune records of conflicted merges that occurred a long time ago. By default, unresolved conflicts older than 15 days and resolved conflicts older than 60 days are pruned. These defaults are controlled via the
gc.rerereResolvedconfiguration variables respectively.
When your topic branch modifies an overlapping area that your master branch (or upstream) touched since your topic branch forked from it, you may want to test it with the latest master, even before your topic branch is ready to be pushed upstream:
o---*---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o master
For such a test, you need to merge master and topic somehow. One way to do it is to pull master into the topic branch:
$ git checkout topic $ git merge master o---*---o---+ topic / / o---o---o---*---o---o master
The commits marked with
* touch the same area in the same
file; you need to resolve the conflicts when creating the commit
+. Then you can test the result to make sure your
work-in-progress still works with what is in the latest master.
After this test merge, there are two ways to continue your work
on the topic. The easiest is to build on top of the test merge
+, and when your work in the topic branch is finally
ready, pull the topic branch into master, and/or ask the
upstream to pull from you. By that time, however, the master or
the upstream might have been advanced since the test merge
in which case the final commit graph would look like this:
$ git checkout topic $ git merge master $ ... work on both topic and master branches $ git checkout master $ git merge topic o---*---o---+---o---o topic / / \ o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master
When your topic branch is long-lived, however, your topic branch would end up having many such "Merge from master" commits on it, which would unnecessarily clutter the development history. Readers of the Linux kernel mailing list may remember that Linus complained about such too frequent test merges when a subsystem maintainer asked to pull from a branch full of "useless merges".
As an alternative, to keep the topic branch clean of test merges, you could blow away the test merge, and keep building on top of the tip before the test merge:
$ git checkout topic $ git merge master $ git reset --hard HEAD^ ;# rewind the test merge $ ... work on both topic and master branches $ git checkout master $ git merge topic o---*---o-------o---o topic / \ o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o---+ master
This would leave only one merge commit when your topic branch is
finally ready and merged into the master branch. This merge
would require you to resolve the conflict, introduced by the
commits marked with
*. However, this conflict is often the
same conflict you resolved when you created the test merge you
blew away. git rerere helps you resolve this final
conflicted merge using the information from your earlier hand
Running the git rerere command immediately after a conflicted
automerge records the conflicted working tree files, with the
usual conflict markers
them. Later, after you are done resolving the conflicts,
running git rerere again will record the resolved state of these
files. Suppose you did this when you created the test merge of
master into the topic branch.
Next time, after seeing the same conflicted automerge,
running git rerere will perform a three-way merge between the
earlier conflicted automerge, the earlier manual resolution, and
the current conflicted automerge.
If this three-way merge resolves cleanly, the result is written
out to your working tree file, so you do not have to manually
resolve it. Note that git rerere leaves the index file alone,
so you still need to do the final sanity checks with
git diff -c) and git add when you are satisfied.
As a convenience measure, git merge automatically invokes git rerere upon exiting with a failed automerge and git rerere records the hand resolve when it is a new conflict, or reuses the earlier hand resolve when it is not. git commit also invokes git rerere when committing a merge result. What this means is that you do not have to do anything special yourself (besides enabling the rerere.enabled config variable).
In our example, when you do the test merge, the manual resolution is recorded, and it will be reused when you do the actual merge later with the updated master and topic branch, as long as the recorded resolution is still applicable.
The information git rerere records is also used when running git rebase. After blowing away the test merge and continuing development on the topic branch:
o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master $ git rebase master topic o---*---o-------o---o topic / o---o---o---*---o---o---o---o master
you could run
git rebase master topic, to bring yourself
up-to-date before your topic is ready to be sent upstream.
This would result in falling back to a three-way merge, and it
would conflict the same way as the test merge you resolved earlier.
git rerere will be run by git rebase to help you resolve this
Part of the git suite